The user has given his consent. The first case is that the user expressly gave his consent at that time, insofar as this is done through certain actions of the parties involved. This consent is valid for , but it will hardly be valid because the data controller must already have evidence that the user has given consent. The second case. e-mail. Update Information Policy. In the second case, the responsible person of the company has updated the information policy on its website, generally titled Privacy Policy . For this treatment no new consent needs to be requested The third case Obtain new consent.
For the third case we gotten into pretty
Swampy territory to the specific processing of its personal data at that time, the collection of data by the means of communication we mentioned is only a disguised way to obtain the due consent of the data controller, but The questions El Salvador WhatsApp Number List users ask are important in their own right: why should the company in question process my data? On what basis have you used them over the years? The fourth case. New treatments? The fourth and final assumption is that, taking advantage of the fact that it is now in force, the company sending the communication approves the new processing and use of the personal data of users it already holds.
By all accounts this violates
There is nothing in the instructions or articles that says double consent is required to run an email marketing campaign; for some reason big companies started this practice without being adequately advised, infecting every other AOL Email List SMB snowball started getting bigger, Became so unstoppable that our inboxes crashed. I’m sure this idea won’t generate a lot of spam in any case, asking users, would you like to hear from us again? Because with these types of communications, companies are saying indirectly at best: We’re not sure what kind of consent we have, we’re not even sure we have it.